You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The neocortical microcircuit collaboration portal: a resource for rat somatosensory cortex
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2015.00044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Srikanth Ramaswamy, Jean-Denis Courcol, Marwan Abdellah, Stanislaw R. Adaszewski, Nicolas Antille, Selim Arsever, Guy Atenekeng, Ahmet Bilgili, Yury Brukau, Athanassia Chalimourda, Giuseppe Chindemi, Fabien Delalondre, Raphael Dumusc, Stefan Eilemann, Michael Emiel Gevaert, Padraig Gleeson, Joe W. Graham, Juan B. Hernando, Lida Kanari, Yury Katkov, Daniel Keller, James G. King, Rajnish Ranjan, Michael W. Reimann, Christian Rössert, Ying Shi, Julian C. Shillcock, Martin Telefont, Werner Van Geit, Jafet Villafranca Diaz, Richard Walker, Yun Wang, Stefano M. Zaninetta, Javier DeFelipe, Sean L. Hill, Jeffrey Muller, Idan Segev, Felix Schürmann, Eilif B. Muller, Henry Markram |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 74% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Belarus | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 40 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 19% |
| Engineering | 12 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,817,531
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#58
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,082
of 290,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.