↓ Skip to main content

Visual Neurons in the Superior Colliculus Innervated by Islet2+ or Islet2− Retinal Ganglion Cells Display Distinct Tuning Properties

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual Neurons in the Superior Colliculus Innervated by Islet2+ or Islet2− Retinal Ganglion Cells Display Distinct Tuning Properties
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2017.00073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel B. Kay, Jason W. Triplett

Abstract

Throughout the visual system, different subtypes of neurons are tuned to distinct aspects of the visual scene, establishing parallel circuits. Defining the mechanisms by which such tuning arises has been a long-standing challenge for neuroscience. To investigate this, we have focused on the retina's projection to the superior colliculus (SC), where multiple visual neuron subtypes have been described. The SC receives inputs from a variety of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) subtypes; however, which RGCs drive the tuning of different SC neurons remains unclear. Here, we pursued a genetic approach that allowed us to determine the tuning properties of neurons innervated by molecularly defined subpopulations of RGCs. In homozygous Islet2-EphA3 knock-in (Isl2(EA3/EA3)) mice, Isl2(+) and Isl2(-) RGCs project to non-overlapping sub-regions of the SC. Based on molecular and anatomic data, we show that significantly more Isl2(-) RGCs are direction-selective (DS) in comparison with Isl2(+) RGCs. Targeted recordings of visual responses from each SC sub-region in Isl2(EA3/EA3) mice revealed that Isl2(-) RGC-innervated neurons were significantly more DS than those innervated by Isl2(+) RGCs. Axis-selective (AS) neurons were found in both sub-regions, though AS neurons innervated by Isl2(+) RGCs were more tightly tuned. Despite this segregation, DS and AS neurons innervated by Isl2(+) or Isl2(-) RGCs did not differ in their spatial summation or spatial frequency (SF) tuning. Further, we did not observe alterations in receptive field (RF) size or structure of SC neurons innervated by Isl2(+) or Isl2(-) RGCs. Together, these data show that innervation by Isl2(+) and Isl2(-) RGCs results in distinct tuning in the SC and set the stage for future studies investigating the mechanisms by which these circuits are built.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,450,513
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#1,034
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,910
of 324,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.