You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fear Learning Regulates Cortical Sensory Representations by Suppressing Habituation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2017.00112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shea N. Gillet, Hiroyuki K. Kato, Marissa A. Justen, Mandy Lai, Jeffry S. Isaacson |
| Abstract |
Projections from auditory cortex to the amygdala are thought to contribute to the induction of auditory fear learning. In addition, fear conditioning has been found to enhance cortical responses to conditioned tones, suggesting that cortical plasticity contributes to fear learning. However, the functional role of auditory cortex in the retrieval of fear memories is unclear and how fear learning regulates cortical sensory representations is not well understood. To address these questions, we use acute optogenetic silencing and chronic two-photon calcium imaging in mouse auditory cortex during fear learning. Longitudinal imaging of neuronal ensemble activity reveals that discriminative fear learning modulates cortical sensory representations via the suppression of cortical habituation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 43 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 16% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,290,659
of 24,072,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#428
of 1,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,635
of 450,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,072,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.