↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Neural Adaptation in Auditory Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling Neural Adaptation in Auditory Cortex
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2018.00072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawel Kudela, Dana Boatman-Reich, David Beeman, William Stanley Anderson

Abstract

Neural responses recorded from auditory cortex exhibit adaptation, a stimulus-specific decrease that occurs when the same sound is presented repeatedly. Stimulus-specific adaptation is thought to facilitate perception in noisy environments. Although adaptation is assumed to arise independently from cortex, this has been difficult to validate directly in vivo. In this study, we used a neural network model of auditory cortex with multicompartmental cell modeling to investigate cortical adaptation. We found that repetitive, non-adapted inputs to layer IV neurons in the model elicited frequency-specific decreases in simulated single neuron, population-level and local field potential (LFP) activity, consistent with stimulus-specific cortical adaptation. Simulated recordings of LFPs, generated solely by excitatory post-synaptic inputs and recorded from layers II/III in the model, showed similar waveform morphologies and stimulus probability effects as auditory evoked responses recorded from human cortex. We tested two proposed mechanisms of cortical adaptation, neural fatigue and neural sharpening, by varying the strength and type of inter- and intra-layer synaptic connections (excitatory, inhibitory). Model simulations showed that synaptic depression modeled in excitatory (AMPA) synapses was sufficient to elicit a reduction in neural firing rate, consistent with neural fatigue. However, introduction of lateral inhibition from local layer II/III interneurons resulted in a reduction in the number of responding neurons, but not their firing rates, consistent with neural sharpening. These modeling results demonstrate that adaptation can arise from multiple neural mechanisms in auditory cortex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 28 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,182,924
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#387
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,611
of 346,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.