You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cortical Microcircuit Mechanisms of Mismatch Negativity and Its Underlying Subcomponents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2020.00013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan M. Ross, Jordan P. Hamm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 38 | 43% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,906,666
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#72
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,579
of 372,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.