↓ Skip to main content

The Non-Random Brain: Efficiency, Economy, and Complex Dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Non-Random Brain: Efficiency, Economy, and Complex Dynamics
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2011.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olaf Sporns

Abstract

Modern anatomical tracing and imaging techniques are beginning to reveal the structural anatomy of neural circuits at small and large scales in unprecedented detail. When examined with analytic tools from graph theory and network science, neural connectivity exhibits highly non-random features, including high clustering and short path length, as well as modules and highly central hub nodes. These characteristic topological features of neural connections shape non-random dynamic interactions that occur during spontaneous activity or in response to external stimulation. Disturbances of connectivity and thus of neural dynamics are thought to underlie a number of disease states of the brain, and some evidence suggests that degraded functional performance of brain networks may be the outcome of a process of randomization affecting their nodes and edges. This article provides a survey of the non-random structure of neural connectivity, primarily at the large scale of regions and pathways in the mammalian cerebral cortex. In addition, we will discuss how non-random connections can give rise to differentiated and complex patterns of dynamics and information flow. Finally, we will explore the idea that at least some disorders of the nervous system are associated with increased randomness of neural connections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Germany 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Netherlands 4 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 342 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 28%
Researcher 80 21%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 41 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 15%
Neuroscience 56 14%
Psychology 54 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 10%
Engineering 37 10%
Other 90 23%
Unknown 54 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,937,398
of 25,104,329 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#317
of 1,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,876
of 193,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,104,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.