↓ Skip to main content

Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robust Transient Dynamics and Brain Functions
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2011.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikhail I. Rabinovich, Pablo Varona

Abstract

In the last few decades several concepts of dynamical systems theory (DST) have guided psychologists, cognitive scientists, and neuroscientists to rethink about sensory motor behavior and embodied cognition. A critical step in the progress of DST application to the brain (supported by modern methods of brain imaging and multi-electrode recording techniques) has been the transfer of its initial success in motor behavior to mental function, i.e., perception, emotion, and cognition. Open questions from research in genetics, ecology, brain sciences, etc., have changed DST itself and lead to the discovery of a new dynamical phenomenon, i.e., reproducible and robust transients that are at the same time sensitive to informational signals. The goal of this review is to describe a new mathematical framework - heteroclinic sequential dynamics - to understand self-organized activity in the brain that can explain certain aspects of robust itinerant behavior. Specifically, we discuss a hierarchy of coarse-grain models of mental dynamics in the form of kinetic equations of modes. These modes compete for resources at three levels: (i) within the same modality, (ii) among different modalities from the same family (like perception), and (iii) among modalities from different families (like emotion and cognition). The analysis of the conditions for robustness, i.e., the structural stability of transient (sequential) dynamics, give us the possibility to explain phenomena like the finite capacity of our sequential working memory - a vital cognitive function -, and to find specific dynamical signatures - different kinds of instabilities - of several brain functions and mental diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 195 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 26%
Researcher 50 23%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 15 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 44 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 16%
Physics and Astronomy 24 11%
Engineering 20 9%
Computer Science 17 8%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 28 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,636,797
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#605
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,614
of 189,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.