↓ Skip to main content

Short-Term Facilitation may Stabilize Parametric Working Memory Trace

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short-Term Facilitation may Stabilize Parametric Working Memory Trace
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2011.00040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladimir Itskov, David Hansel, Misha Tsodyks

Abstract

Networks with continuous set of attractors are considered to be a paradigmatic model for parametric working memory (WM), but require fine tuning of connections and are thus structurally unstable. Here we analyzed the network with ring attractor, where connections are not perfectly tuned and the activity state therefore drifts in the absence of the stabilizing stimulus. We derive an analytical expression for the drift dynamics and conclude that the network cannot function as WM for a period of several seconds, a typical delay time in monkey memory experiments. We propose that short-term synaptic facilitation in recurrent connections significantly improves the robustness of the model by slowing down the drift of activity bump. Extending the calculation of the drift velocity to network with synaptic facilitation, we conclude that facilitation can slow down the drift by a large factor, rendering the network suitable as a model of WM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Switzerland 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 109 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 33%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 22%
Neuroscience 23 19%
Psychology 15 12%
Physics and Astronomy 11 9%
Computer Science 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,882,301
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#74
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,825
of 180,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.