↓ Skip to main content

An Instruction Language for Self-Construction in the Context of Neural Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Instruction Language for Self-Construction in the Context of Neural Networks
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2011.00057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederic Zubler, Andreas Hauri, Sabina Pfister, Adrian M. Whatley, Matthew Cook, Rodney Douglas

Abstract

Biological systems are based on an entirely different concept of construction than human artifacts. They construct themselves by a process of self-organization that is a systematic spatio-temporal generation of, and interaction between, various specialized cell types. We propose a framework for designing gene-like codes for guiding the self-construction of neural networks. The description of neural development is formalized by defining a set of primitive actions taken locally by neural precursors during corticogenesis. These primitives can be combined into networks of instructions similar to biochemical pathways, capable of reproducing complex developmental sequences in a biologically plausible way. Moreover, the conditional activation and deactivation of these instruction networks can also be controlled by these primitives, allowing for the design of a "genetic code" containing both coding and regulating elements. We demonstrate in a simulation of physical cell development how this code can be incorporated into a single progenitor, which then by replication and differentiation, reproduces important aspects of corticogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Switzerland 2 3%
Japan 2 3%
Australia 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 22%
Neuroscience 11 17%
Engineering 8 13%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,616,366
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#260
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,104
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.