↓ Skip to main content

Spike Train Auto-Structure Impacts Post-Synaptic Firing and Timing-Based Plasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spike Train Auto-Structure Impacts Post-Synaptic Firing and Timing-Based Plasticity
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2011.00060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bertram Scheller, Marta Castellano, Raul Vicente, Gordon Pipa

Abstract

Cortical neurons are typically driven by several thousand synapses. The precise spatiotemporal pattern formed by these inputs can modulate the response of a post-synaptic cell. In this work, we explore how the temporal structure of pre-synaptic inhibitory and excitatory inputs impact the post-synaptic firing of a conductance-based integrate and fire neuron. Both the excitatory and inhibitory input was modeled by renewal gamma processes with varying shape factors for modeling regular and temporally random Poisson activity. We demonstrate that the temporal structure of mutually independent inputs affects the post-synaptic firing, while the strength of the effect depends on the firing rates of both the excitatory and inhibitory inputs. In a second step, we explore the effect of temporal structure of mutually independent inputs on a simple version of Hebbian learning, i.e., hard bound spike-timing-dependent plasticity. We explore both the equilibrium weight distribution and the speed of the transient weight dynamics for different mutually independent gamma processes. We find that both the equilibrium distribution of the synaptic weights and the speed of synaptic changes are modulated by the temporal structure of the input. Finally, we highlight that the sensitivity of both the post-synaptic firing as well as the spike-timing-dependent plasticity on the auto-structure of the input of a neuron could be used to modulate the learning rate of synaptic modification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Belarus 1 3%
Unknown 32 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 35%
Neuroscience 6 16%
Psychology 5 14%
Linguistics 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1,156
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,848
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.