↓ Skip to main content

Emergent bursting and synchrony in computer simulations of neuronal cultures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergent bursting and synchrony in computer simulations of neuronal cultures
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niru Maheswaranathan, Silvia Ferrari, Antonius M. J. VanDongen, Craig S. Henriquez

Abstract

Experimental studies of neuronal cultures have revealed a wide variety of spiking network activity ranging from sparse, asynchronous firing to distinct, network-wide synchronous bursting. However, the functional mechanisms driving these observed firing patterns are not well understood. In this work, we develop an in silico network of cortical neurons based on known features of similar in vitro networks. The activity from these simulations is found to closely mimic experimental data. Furthermore, the strength or degree of network bursting is found to depend on a few parameters: the density of the culture, the type of synaptic connections, and the ratio of excitatory to inhibitory connections. Network bursting gradually becomes more prominent as either the density, the fraction of long range connections, or the fraction of excitatory neurons is increased. Interestingly, biologically prevalent values of parameters result in networks that are at the transition between strong bursting and sparse firing. Using principal components analysis, we show that a large fraction of the variance in firing rates is captured by the first component for bursting networks. These results have implications for understanding how information is encoded at the population level as well as for why certain network parameters are ubiquitous in cortical tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 60 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 33%
Researcher 15 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Physics and Astronomy 11 16%
Engineering 8 12%
Neuroscience 8 12%
Computer Science 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,150,222
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#688
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,445
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#34
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.