↓ Skip to main content

Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmund T. Rolls

Abstract

Neurophysiological evidence for invariant representations of objects and faces in the primate inferior temporal visual cortex is described. Then a computational approach to how invariant representations are formed in the brain is described that builds on the neurophysiology. A feature hierarchy model in which invariant representations can be built by self-organizing learning based on the temporal and spatial statistics of the visual input produced by objects as they transform in the world is described. VisNet can use temporal continuity in an associative synaptic learning rule with a short-term memory trace, and/or it can use spatial continuity in continuous spatial transformation learning which does not require a temporal trace. The model of visual processing in the ventral cortical stream can build representations of objects that are invariant with respect to translation, view, size, and also lighting. The model has been extended to provide an account of invariant representations in the dorsal visual system of the global motion produced by objects such as looming, rotation, and object-based movement. The model has been extended to incorporate top-down feedback connections to model the control of attention by biased competition in, for example, spatial and object search tasks. The approach has also been extended to account for how the visual system can select single objects in complex visual scenes, and how multiple objects can be represented in a scene. The approach has also been extended to provide, with an additional layer, for the development of representations of spatial scenes of the type found in the hippocampus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 4 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 164 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 39 21%
Neuroscience 32 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 16%
Psychology 28 15%
Engineering 16 9%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 25 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,944,738
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#273
of 1,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,881
of 245,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#16
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.