↓ Skip to main content

Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 1,475)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
35 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Hunter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Austria 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 16 28%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Computer Science 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Other 16 28%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#729,506
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#30
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,935
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#8
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.