↓ Skip to main content

How anatomy shapes dynamics: a semi-analytical study of the brain at rest by a simple spin model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How anatomy shapes dynamics: a semi-analytical study of the brain at rest by a simple spin model
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Deco, Mario Senden, Viktor Jirsa

Abstract

Resting state networks (RSNs) show a surprisingly coherent and robust spatiotemporal organization. Previous theoretical studies demonstrated that these patterns can be understood as emergent on the basis of the underlying neuroanatomical connectivity skeleton. Integrating the biologically realistic DTI/DSI-(Diffusion Tensor Imaging/Diffusion Spectrum Imaging)based neuroanatomical connectivity into a brain model of Ising spin dynamics, we found a system with multiple attractors, which can be studied analytically. The multistable attractor landscape thus defines a functionally meaningful dynamic repertoire of the brain network that is inherently present in the neuroanatomical connectivity. We demonstrate that the more entropy of attractors exists, the richer is the dynamical repertoire and consequently the brain network displays more capabilities of computation. We hypothesize therefore that human brain connectivity developed a scale free type of architecture in order to be able to store a large number of different and flexibly accessible brain functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 174 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 27%
Researcher 45 24%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 43 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 19%
Physics and Astronomy 19 10%
Psychology 18 9%
Engineering 12 6%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,424,518
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#622
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,845
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#28
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.