↓ Skip to main content

Brain state-dependent neuronal computation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain state-dependent neuronal computation
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascale P. Quilichini, Christophe Bernard

Abstract

Neuronal firing pattern, which includes both the frequency and the timing of action potentials, is a key component of information processing in the brain. Although the relationship between neuronal output (the firing pattern) and function (during a task/behavior) is not fully understood, there is now considerable evidence that a given neuron can show very different firing patterns according to brain state. Thus, such neurons assembled into neuronal networks generate different rhythms (e.g., theta, gamma and sharp wave ripples), which sign specific brain states (e.g., learning, sleep). This implies that a given neuronal network, defined by its hard-wired physical connectivity, can support different brain state-dependent activities through the modulation of its functional connectivity. Here, we review data demonstrating that not only the firing pattern, but also the functional connections between neurons, can change dynamically. We then explore the possible mechanisms of such versatility, focusing on the intrinsic properties of neurons and the properties of the synapses they establish, and how they can be modified by neuromodulators, i.e., the different ways that neurons can use to switch from one mode of communication to the other.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 94 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Professor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 33%
Neuroscience 26 25%
Computer Science 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,734,103
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#764
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,242
of 244,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#36
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.