↓ Skip to main content

A model of food reward learning with dynamic reward exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A model of food reward learning with dynamic reward exposure
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ross A. Hammond, Joseph T. Ornstein, Lesley K. Fellows, Laurette Dubé, Robert Levitan, Alain Dagher

Abstract

The process of conditioning via reward learning is highly relevant to the study of food choice and obesity. Learning is itself shaped by environmental exposure, with the potential for such exposures to vary substantially across individuals and across place and time. In this paper, we use computational techniques to extend a well-validated standard model of reward learning, introducing both substantial heterogeneity and dynamic reward exposures. We then apply the extended model to a food choice context. The model produces a variety of individual behaviors and population-level patterns which are not evident from the traditional formulation, but which offer potential insights for understanding food reward learning and obesity. These include a "lock-in" effect, through which early exposure can strongly shape later reward valuation. We discuss potential implications of our results for the study and prevention of obesity, for the reward learning field, and for future experimental and computational work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 15%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 23 31%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,313,431
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#993
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,682
of 253,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#47
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.