↓ Skip to main content

Triphasic spike-timing-dependent plasticity organizes networks to produce robust sequences of neural activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Triphasic spike-timing-dependent plasticity organizes networks to produce robust sequences of neural activity
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia Waddington, Peter A. Appleby, Marc De Kamps, Netta Cohen

Abstract

Synfire chains have long been proposed to generate precisely timed sequences of neural activity. Such activity has been linked to numerous neural functions including sensory encoding, cognitive and motor responses. In particular, it has been argued that synfire chains underlie the precise spatiotemporal firing patterns that control song production in a variety of songbirds. Previous studies have suggested that the development of synfire chains requires either initial sparse connectivity or strong topological constraints, in addition to any synaptic learning rules. Here, we show that this necessity can be removed by using a previously reported but hitherto unconsidered spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rule and activity-dependent excitability. Under this rule the network develops stable synfire chains that possess a non-trivial, scalable multi-layer structure, in which relative layer sizes appear to follow a universal function. Using computational modeling and a coarse grained random walk model, we demonstrate the role of the STDP rule in growing, molding and stabilizing the chain, and link model parameters to the resulting structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Germany 2 3%
Switzerland 2 3%
France 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Unknown 62 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 34%
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 28%
Neuroscience 12 16%
Computer Science 12 16%
Physics and Astronomy 8 11%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,670,751
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#957
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,346
of 244,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#46
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.