↓ Skip to main content

Identifying the synaptic origin of ongoing neuronal oscillations through spatial discrimination of electric fields

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying the synaptic origin of ongoing neuronal oscillations through spatial discrimination of electric fields
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2013.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Fernández-Ruiz, Oscar Herreras

Abstract

Although intracerebral field potential oscillations are commonly used to study information processing during cognition and behavior, the cellular and network processes underlying such events remain unclear. The limited spatial resolution of standard single-point recordings does not clarify whether field oscillations reflect the activity of one or many afferent presynaptic populations. However, multi-site recording devices now provide high-resolution spatial profiles of local field potentials (LFPs) and when coupled to modern mathematical analyses that discriminate signals with distinct but overlapping spatial distributions, they open the door to better understand these potentials. Here we review recent insights that help disentangle certain pathway-specific activities. Accordingly, some oscillatory patterns can now be viewed as a periodic succession of synchronous synaptic currents that reflect the time envelope of spiking activity in given presynaptic populations. These analyses modify our concept of brain rhythms as abstract entities, molding them into mechanistic representations of network activity and allowing us to work in the time domain, reducing the loss of information inherent to data-chopping frequency treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Spain 3 3%
Norway 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 86 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 32%
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 33 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 27%
Engineering 7 7%
Physics and Astronomy 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,862,890
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#364
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,297
of 280,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#29
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.