↓ Skip to main content

Multi-stable perception balances stability and sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-stable perception balances stability and sensitivity
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2013.00017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Pastukhov, Pedro E. García-Rodríguez, Joachim Haenicke, Antoni Guillamon, Gustavo Deco, Jochen Braun

Abstract

We report that multi-stable perception operates in a consistent, dynamical regime, balancing the conflicting goals of stability and sensitivity. When a multi-stable visual display is viewed continuously, its phenomenal appearance reverses spontaneously at irregular intervals. We characterized the perceptual dynamics of individual observers in terms of four statistical measures: the distribution of dominance times (mean and variance) and the novel, subtle dependence on prior history (correlation and time-constant). The dynamics of multi-stable perception is known to reflect several stabilizing and destabilizing factors. Phenomenologically, its main aspects are captured by a simplistic computational model with competition, adaptation, and noise. We identified small parameter volumes (~3% of the possible volume) in which the model reproduced both dominance distribution and history-dependence of each observer. For 21 of 24 data sets, the identified volumes clustered tightly (~15% of the possible volume), revealing a consistent "operating regime" of multi-stable perception. The "operating regime" turned out to be marginally stable or, equivalently, near the brink of an oscillatory instability. The chance probability of the observed clustering was <0.02. To understand the functional significance of this empirical "operating regime," we compared it to the theoretical "sweet spot" of the model. We computed this "sweet spot" as the intersection of the parameter volumes in which the model produced stable perceptual outcomes and in which it was sensitive to input modulations. Remarkably, the empirical "operating regime" proved to be largely coextensive with the theoretical "sweet spot." This demonstrated that perceptual dynamics was not merely consistent but also functionally optimized (in that it balances stability with sensitivity). Our results imply that multi-stable perception is not a laboratory curiosity, but reflects a functional optimization of perceptual dynamics for visual inference.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 90 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 29%
Researcher 30 29%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Neuroscience 15 15%
Computer Science 8 8%
Engineering 8 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#5,941,536
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#277
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,472
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#22
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.