↓ Skip to main content

Nonlinear multiplicative dendritic integration in neuron and network models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonlinear multiplicative dendritic integration in neuron and network models
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2013.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danke Zhang, Yuanqing Li, Malte J. Rasch, Si Wu

Abstract

Neurons receive inputs from thousands of synapses distributed across dendritic trees of complex morphology. It is known that dendritic integration of excitatory and inhibitory synapses can be highly non-linear in reality and can heavily depend on the exact location and spatial arrangement of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on the dendrite. Despite this known fact, most neuron models used in artificial neural networks today still only describe the voltage potential of a single somatic compartment and assume a simple linear summation of all individual synaptic inputs. We here suggest a new biophysical motivated derivation of a single compartment model that integrates the non-linear effects of shunting inhibition, where an inhibitory input on the route of an excitatory input to the soma cancels or "shunts" the excitatory potential. In particular, our integration of non-linear dendritic processing into the neuron model follows a simple multiplicative rule, suggested recently by experiments, and allows for strict mathematical treatment of network effects. Using our new formulation, we further devised a spiking network model where inhibitory neurons act as global shunting gates, and show that the network exhibits persistent activity in a low firing regime.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 7%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 29%
Neuroscience 17 22%
Engineering 10 13%
Computer Science 6 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,192,189
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1,157
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,747
of 280,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#105
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.