↓ Skip to main content

The relevance of network micro-structure for neural dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relevance of network micro-structure for neural dynamics
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2013.00072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Volker Pernice, Moritz Deger, Stefano Cardanobile, Stefan Rotter

Abstract

The activity of cortical neurons is determined by the input they receive from presynaptic neurons. Many previous studies have investigated how specific aspects of the statistics of the input affect the spike trains of single neurons and neurons in recurrent networks. However, typically very simple random network models are considered in such studies. Here we use a recently developed algorithm to construct networks based on a quasi-fractal probability measure which are much more variable than commonly used network models, and which therefore promise to sample the space of recurrent networks in a more exhaustive fashion than previously possible. We use the generated graphs as the underlying network topology in simulations of networks of integrate-and-fire neurons in an asynchronous and irregular state. Based on an extensive dataset of networks and neuronal simulations we assess statistical relations between features of the network structure and the spiking activity. Our results highlight the strong influence that some details of the network structure have on the activity dynamics of both single neurons and populations, even if some global network parameters are kept fixed. We observe specific and consistent relations between activity characteristics like spike-train irregularity or correlations and network properties, for example the distributions of the numbers of in- and outgoing connections or clustering. Exploiting these relations, we demonstrate that it is possible to estimate structural characteristics of the network from activity data. We also assess higher order correlations of spiking activity in the various networks considered here, and find that their occurrence strongly depends on the network structure. These results provide directions for further theoretical studies on recurrent networks, as well as new ways to interpret spike train recordings from neural circuits.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Unknown 82 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 35%
Researcher 25 27%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 25%
Computer Science 13 14%
Engineering 12 13%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,024
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1,157
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,758
of 280,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#105
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.