Title |
Large-scale network organization in the avian forebrain: a connectivity matrix and theoretical analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncom.2013.00089 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Murray Shanahan, Verner P. Bingman, Toru Shimizu, Martin Wild, Onur Güntürkün |
Abstract |
Many species of birds, including pigeons, possess demonstrable cognitive capacities, and some are capable of cognitive feats matching those of apes. Since mammalian cortex is laminar while the avian telencephalon is nucleated, it is natural to ask whether the brains of these two cognitively capable taxa, despite their apparent anatomical dissimilarities, might exhibit common principles of organization on some level. Complementing recent investigations of macro-scale brain connectivity in mammals, including humans and macaques, we here present the first large-scale "wiring diagram" for the forebrain of a bird. Using graph theory, we show that the pigeon telencephalon is organized along similar lines to that of a mammal. Both are modular, small-world networks with a connective core of hub nodes that includes prefrontal-like and hippocampal structures. These hub nodes are, topologically speaking, the most central regions of the pigeon's brain, as well as being the most richly connected, implying a crucial role in information flow. Overall, our analysis suggests that indeed, despite the absence of cortical layers and close to 300 million years of separate evolution, the connectivity of the avian brain conforms to the same organizational principles as the mammalian brain. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 23% |
Japan | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Italy | 2 | 6% |
Israel | 1 | 3% |
Romania | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Serbia | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Belarus | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 1% |
Unknown | 206 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 24% |
Researcher | 41 | 18% |
Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
Professor | 19 | 8% |
Other | 40 | 18% |
Unknown | 23 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 46 | 20% |
Psychology | 28 | 12% |
Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
Engineering | 9 | 4% |
Other | 42 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 13% |