↓ Skip to main content

Rapid, parallel path planning by propagating wavefronts of spiking neural activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid, parallel path planning by propagating wavefronts of spiking neural activity
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2013.00098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filip Ponulak, John J. Hopfield

Abstract

Efficient path planning and navigation is critical for animals, robotics, logistics and transportation. We study a model in which spatial navigation problems can rapidly be solved in the brain by parallel mental exploration of alternative routes using propagating waves of neural activity. A wave of spiking activity propagates through a hippocampus-like network, altering the synaptic connectivity. The resulting vector field of synaptic change then guides a simulated animal to the appropriate selected target locations. We demonstrate that the navigation problem can be solved using realistic, local synaptic plasticity rules during a single passage of a wavefront. Our model can find optimal solutions for competing possible targets or learn and navigate in multiple environments. The model provides a hypothesis on the possible computational mechanisms for optimal path planning in the brain, at the same time it is useful for neuromorphic implementations, where the parallelism of information processing proposed here can fully be harnessed in hardware.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 97 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 27%
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 13 12%
Professor 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 24 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 20%
Engineering 18 17%
Computer Science 15 14%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,022,230
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#130
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,688
of 289,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#13
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.