You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plasticity and modular control of locomotor patterns in neurological disorders with motor deficits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncom.2013.00123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y. P. Ivanenko, G. Cappellini, I. A. Solopova, A. A. Grishin, M. J. MacLellan, R. E. Poppele, F. Lacquaniti |
| Abstract |
Human locomotor movements exhibit considerable variability and are highly complex in terms of both neural activation and biomechanical output. The building blocks with which the central nervous system constructs these motor patterns can be preserved in patients with various sensory-motor disorders. In particular, several studies highlighted a modular burst-like organization of the muscle activity. Here we review and discuss this issue with a particular emphasis on the various examples of adaptation of locomotor patterns in patients (with large fiber neuropathy, amputees, stroke and spinal cord injury). The results highlight plasticity and different solutions to reorganize muscle patterns in both peripheral and central nervous system lesions. The findings are discussed in a general context of compensatory gait mechanisms, spatiotemporal architecture and modularity of the locomotor program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 41 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,423,663
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#595
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,301
of 289,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#52
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.