↓ Skip to main content

An algorithm to predict the connectome of neural microcircuits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 1,459)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An algorithm to predict the connectome of neural microcircuits
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2015.00120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael W. Reimann, James G. King, Eilif B. Muller, Srikanth Ramaswamy, Henry Markram

Abstract

Experimentally mapping synaptic connections, in terms of the numbers and locations of their synapses and estimating connection probabilities, is still not a tractable task, even for small volumes of tissue. In fact, the six layers of the neocortex contain thousands of unique types of synaptic connections between the many different types of neurons, of which only a handful have been characterized experimentally. Here we present a theoretical framework and a data-driven algorithmic strategy to digitally reconstruct the complete synaptic connectivity between the different types of neurons in a small well-defined volume of tissue-the micro-scale connectome of a neural microcircuit. By enforcing a set of established principles of synaptic connectivity, and leveraging interdependencies between fundamental properties of neural microcircuits to constrain the reconstructed connectivity, the algorithm yields three parameters per connection type that predict the anatomy of all types of biologically viable synaptic connections. The predictions reproduce a spectrum of experimental data on synaptic connectivity not used by the algorithm. We conclude that an algorithmic approach to the connectome can serve as a tool to accelerate experimental mapping, indicating the minimal dataset required to make useful predictions, identifying the datasets required to improve their accuracy, testing the feasibility of experimental measurements, and making it possible to test hypotheses of synaptic connectivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 186 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 23%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 59 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 21%
Computer Science 16 8%
Engineering 14 7%
Physics and Astronomy 13 7%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 26 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,025,487
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#40
of 1,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,997
of 290,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.