↓ Skip to main content

Toward an Integration of Deep Learning and Neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,472)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
260 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
8 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
477 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2249 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward an Integration of Deep Learning and Neuroscience
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2016.00094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam H. Marblestone, Greg Wayne, Konrad P. Kording

Abstract

Neuroscience has focused on the detailed implementation of computation, studying neural codes, dynamics and circuits. In machine learning, however, artificial neural networks tend to eschew precisely designed codes, dynamics or circuits in favor of brute force optimization of a cost function, often using simple and relatively uniform initial architectures. Two recent developments have emerged within machine learning that create an opportunity to connect these seemingly divergent perspectives. First, structured architectures are used, including dedicated systems for attention, recursion and various forms of short- and long-term memory storage. Second, cost functions and training procedures have become more complex and are varied across layers and over time. Here we think about the brain in terms of these ideas. We hypothesize that (1) the brain optimizes cost functions, (2) the cost functions are diverse and differ across brain locations and over development, and (3) optimization operates within a pre-structured architecture matched to the computational problems posed by behavior. In support of these hypotheses, we argue that a range of implementations of credit assignment through multiple layers of neurons are compatible with our current knowledge of neural circuitry, and that the brain's specialized systems can be interpreted as enabling efficient optimization for specific problem classes. Such a heterogeneously optimized system, enabled by a series of interacting cost functions, serves to make learning data-efficient and precisely targeted to the needs of the organism. We suggest directions by which neuroscience could seek to refine and test these hypotheses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 <1%
Germany 9 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
France 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 21 <1%
Unknown 2177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 578 26%
Researcher 361 16%
Student > Master 334 15%
Student > Bachelor 240 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 89 4%
Other 303 13%
Unknown 344 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 601 27%
Neuroscience 427 19%
Engineering 233 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 7%
Psychology 130 6%
Other 278 12%
Unknown 422 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 209. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#188,094
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#7
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,657
of 331,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.