↓ Skip to main content

Timing Intervals Using Population Synchrony and Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing Intervals Using Population Synchrony and Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2016.00123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Xu, Stuart N. Baker

Abstract

We present a computational model by which ensembles of regularly spiking neurons can encode different time intervals through synchronous firing. We show that a neuron responding to a large population of convergent inputs has the potential to learn to produce an appropriately-timed output via spike-time dependent plasticity. We explain why temporal variability of this population synchrony increases with increasing time intervals. We also show that the scalar property of timing and its violation at short intervals can be explained by the spike-wise accumulation of jitter in the inter-spike intervals of timing neurons. We explore how the challenge of encoding longer time intervals can be overcome and conclude that this may involve a switch to a different population of neurons with lower firing rate, with the added effect of producing an earlier bias in response. Experimental data on human timing performance show features in agreement with the model's output.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 14%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 33%
Mathematics 4 19%
Psychology 4 19%
Computer Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,355,479
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1,161
of 1,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,442
of 416,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#30
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.