↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the Dynamics of Human Brain Activity with Recurrent Neural Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,452)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
17 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the Dynamics of Human Brain Activity with Recurrent Neural Networks
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2017.00007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Umut Güçlü, Marcel A. J. van Gerven

Abstract

Encoding models are used for predicting brain activity in response to sensory stimuli with the objective of elucidating how sensory information is represented in the brain. Encoding models typically comprise a nonlinear transformation of stimuli to features (feature model) and a linear convolution of features to responses (response model). While there has been extensive work on developing better feature models, the work on developing better response models has been rather limited. Here, we investigate the extent to which recurrent neural network models can use their internal memories for nonlinear processing of arbitrary feature sequences to predict feature-evoked response sequences as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. We show that the proposed recurrent neural network models can significantly outperform established response models by accurately estimating long-term dependencies that drive hemodynamic responses. The results open a new window into modeling the dynamics of brain activity in response to sensory stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 220 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 22%
Researcher 42 18%
Student > Master 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 37 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 53 23%
Neuroscience 49 21%
Engineering 24 10%
Psychology 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 51 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,390,214
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#48
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,553
of 432,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.