↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Cyclicity Analysis With Pre-established Functional Connectivity Methods to Identify Individuals and Subject Groups Using Resting State fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Cyclicity Analysis With Pre-established Functional Connectivity Methods to Identify Individuals and Subject Groups Using Resting State fMRI
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2020
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2019.00094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Somayeh Shahsavarani, Ivan T. Abraham, Benjamin J. Zimmerman, Yuliy M. Baryshnikov, Fatima T. Husain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 13 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 15%
Unspecified 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#20,601,627
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1,176
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382,129
of 456,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#33
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.