↓ Skip to main content

Computational modeling to study the impact of changes in Nav1.8 sodium channel on neuropathic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational modeling to study the impact of changes in Nav1.8 sodium channel on neuropathic pain
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2024.1327986
Authors

Peter Kan, Yong Fang Zhu, Junling Ma, Gurmit Singh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,671,379
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#924
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,491
of 167,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them