↓ Skip to main content

FDG-PET imaging in mild traumatic brain injury: a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroenergetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FDG-PET imaging in mild traumatic brain injury: a critical review
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroenergetics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnene.2013.00013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly R. Byrnes, Colin M. Wilson, Fiona Brabazon, Ramona von Leden, Jennifer S. Jurgens, Terrence R. Oakes, Reed G. Selwyn

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects an estimated 1.7 million people in the United States and is a contributing factor to one third of all injury related deaths annually. According to the CDC, approximately 75% of all reported TBIs are concussions or considered mild in form, although the number of unreported mild TBIs (mTBI) and patients not seeking medical attention is unknown. Currently, classification of mTBI or concussion is a clinical assessment since diagnostic imaging is typically inconclusive due to subtle, obscure, or absent changes in anatomical or physiological parameters measured using standard magnetic resonance (MR) or computed tomography (CT) imaging protocols. Molecular imaging techniques that examine functional processes within the brain, such as measurement of glucose uptake and metabolism using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), have the ability to detect changes after mTBI. Recent technological improvements in the resolution of PET systems, the integration of PET with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the availability of normal healthy human databases and commercial image analysis software contribute to the growing use of molecular imaging in basic science research and advances in clinical imaging. This review will discuss the technological considerations and limitations of FDG-PET, including differentiation between glucose uptake and glucose metabolism and the significance of these measurements. In addition, the current state of FDG-PET imaging in assessing mTBI in clinical and preclinical research will be considered. Finally, this review will provide insight into potential critical data elements and recommended standardization to improve the application of FDG-PET to mTBI research and clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 171 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 18 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 25%
Neuroscience 31 17%
Psychology 12 7%
Engineering 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 47 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,183,391
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroenergetics
#5
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,862
of 318,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroenergetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them