↓ Skip to main content

Acute human brain responses to intracortical microelectrode arrays: challenges and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroengineering, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute human brain responses to intracortical microelectrode arrays: challenges and future prospects
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroengineering, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneng.2014.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Fernández, Bradley Greger, Paul A. House, Ignacio Aranda, Carlos Botella, Julio Albisua, Cristina Soto-Sánchez, Arantxa Alfaro, Richard A. Normann

Abstract

The emerging field of neuroprosthetics is focused on the development of new therapeutic interventions that will be able to restore some lost neural function by selective electrical stimulation or by harnessing activity recorded from populations of neurons. As more and more patients benefit from these approaches, the interest in neural interfaces has grown significantly and a new generation of penetrating microelectrode arrays are providing unprecedented access to the neurons of the central nervous system (CNS). These microelectrodes have active tip dimensions that are similar in size to neurons and because they penetrate the nervous system, they provide selective access to these cells (within a few microns). However, the very long-term viability of chronically implanted microelectrodes and the capability of recording the same spiking activity over long time periods still remain to be established and confirmed in human studies. Here we review the main responses to acute implantation of microelectrode arrays, and emphasize that it will become essential to control the neural tissue damage induced by these intracortical microelectrodes in order to achieve the high clinical potentials accompanying this technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 236 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 79 32%
Neuroscience 42 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 7%
Materials Science 10 4%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 48 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#13,917,225
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#41
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,730
of 228,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.