↓ Skip to main content

Changes in functional brain organization and behavioral correlations after rehabilitative therapy using a brain-computer interface

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroengineering, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in functional brain organization and behavioral correlations after rehabilitative therapy using a brain-computer interface
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroengineering, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneng.2014.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brittany M. Young, Zack Nigogosyan, Léo M. Walton, Jie Song, Veena A. Nair, Scott W. Grogan, Mitchell E. Tyler, Dorothy F. Edwards, Kristin Caldera, Justin A. Sattin, Justin C. Williams, Vivek Prabhakaran

Abstract

This study aims to examine the changes in task-related brain activity induced by rehabilitative therapy using brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies and whether these changes are relevant to functional gains achieved through the use of these therapies. Stroke patients with persistent upper-extremity motor deficits received interventional rehabilitation therapy using a closed-loop neurofeedback BCI device (n = 8) or no therapy (n = 6). Behavioral assessments using the Stroke Impact Scale, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) as well as task-based fMRI scans were conducted before, during, after, and 1 month after therapy administration or at analogous intervals in the absence of therapy. Laterality Index (LI) values during finger tapping of each hand were calculated for each time point and assessed for correlation with behavioral outcomes. Brain activity during finger tapping of each hand shifted over the course of BCI therapy, but not in the absence of therapy, to greater involvement of the non-lesioned hemisphere (and lesser involvement of the stroke-lesioned hemisphere) as measured by LI. Moreover, changes from baseline LI values during finger tapping of the impaired hand were correlated with gains in both objective and subjective behavioral measures. These findings suggest that the administration of interventional BCI therapy can induce differential changes in brain activity patterns between the lesioned and non-lesioned hemispheres and that these brain changes are associated with changes in specific motor functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 132 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Professor 6 4%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 18%
Engineering 25 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Psychology 10 7%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#61
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,499
of 226,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.