You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interaction of BCI with the underlying neurological conditions in patients: pros and cons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroengineering, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneng.2014.00042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aleksandra Vuckovic, Jaime A. Pineda, Kristen LaMarca, Disha Gupta, Christoph Guger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#21
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,425
of 369,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.