↓ Skip to main content

Neural Evidence for Compromised Motor Imagery in Right Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Evidence for Compromised Motor Imagery in Right Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2010.00150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michiel van Elk, Celine Crajé, Manuela E. G. V. Beeren, Bert Steenbergen, Hein T. van Schie, Harold Bekkering

Abstract

In the present event-related potential (ERP) study we investigated the neural and temporal dynamics of motor imagery in participants with right-sided hemiparetic cerebral palsy (HCP; n = 10) and in left-handed control participants (n = 10). A mental rotation task was used in which participants were required to judge the laterality of hand pictures. At a behavioral level participants with HCP were slower in making hand laterality judgments compared to control subjects, especially when presented with pictures representing the affected hand. At a neural level, individuals with HCP were characterized by a reduced rotation-related negativity (RRN) over parietal areas, that was delayed in onset with respect to control participants. Interestingly, participants that were relatively mildly impaired showed a stronger RRN for the rotation of right-hand stimuli than participants that were more strongly impaired in their motor function, suggesting a direct relation between the motor imagery process and the biomechanical constraints of the participant. Together, the results provide new insights in the relation between motor imagery and motor capabilities and indicate that participants with HCP may be characterized by a compromised ability to use motor imagery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
China 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Sports and Recreations 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2011.
All research outputs
#4,619,650
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,734
of 11,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,743
of 163,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.