↓ Skip to main content

Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2011.00044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc A. Lazzaro, Osama O. Zaidat, Nils Mueller-Kronast, Muhammad A. Taqi, Douglas Woo

Abstract

Recent reports have emerged suggesting that multiple sclerosis (MS) may be due to abnormal venous outflow from the central nervous system, termed chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI). These reports have generated strong interest and controversy over the prospect of a treatable cause of this chronic debilitating disease. This review aims to describe the proposed association between CCSVI and MS, summarize the current data, and discuss the role of endovascular therapy and the need for rigorous randomized clinical trials to evaluate this association and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 13 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 81%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,855,390
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,343
of 11,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,580
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#13
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.