↓ Skip to main content

How Aging Affects Sleep-Dependent Memory Consolidation?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Aging Affects Sleep-Dependent Memory Consolidation?
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2012.00008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Harand, Françoise Bertran, Franck Doidy, Fabian Guénolé, Béatrice Desgranges, Francis Eustache, Géraldine Rauchs

Abstract

Memories are not stored as they were initially encoded but rather undergo a gradual reorganization process, termed memory consolidation. Numerous data indicate that sleep plays a major role in this process, notably due to the specific neurochemical environment and the electrophysiological activity observed during the night. Two putative, probably not exclusive, models ("hippocampo-neocortical dialogue" and "synaptic homeostasis hypothesis") have been proposed to explain the beneficial effect of sleep on memory processes. However, all data gathered until now emerged from studies conducted in young subjects. The investigation of the relationships between sleep and memory in older adults has sparked off little interest until recently. Though, aging is characterized by memory impairment, changes in sleep architecture, as well as brain and neurochemical alterations. All these elements suggest that sleep-dependent memory consolidation may be impaired or occurs differently in older adults. This review outlines the mechanisms governing sleep-dependent memory consolidation, and the crucial points of this complex process that may dysfunction and result in impaired memory consolidation in aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
France 4 3%
United States 4 3%
Canada 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 138 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 36%
Neuroscience 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,868,115
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#866
of 11,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,353
of 244,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#11
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.