↓ Skip to main content

A Fully Immersive Set-Up for Remote Interaction and Neurorehabilitation Based on Virtual Body Ownership

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Fully Immersive Set-Up for Remote Interaction and Neurorehabilitation Based on Virtual Body Ownership
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2012.00110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Perez-Marcos, Massimiliano Solazzi, William Steptoe, Oyewole Oyekoya, Antonio Frisoli, Tim Weyrich, Anthony Steed, Franco Tecchia, Mel Slater, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives

Abstract

Although telerehabilitation systems represent one of the most technologically appealing clinical solutions for the immediate future, they still present limitations that prevent their standardization. Here we propose an integrated approach that includes three key and novel factors: (a) fully immersive virtual environments, including virtual body representation and ownership; (b) multimodal interaction with remote people and virtual objects including haptic interaction; and (c) a physical representation of the patient at the hospital through embodiment agents (e.g., as a physical robot). The importance of secure and rapid communication between the nodes is also stressed and an example implemented solution is described. Finally, we discuss the proposed approach with reference to the existing literature and systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 130 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Professor 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 16%
Computer Science 21 15%
Engineering 18 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Neuroscience 13 9%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,248,214
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,147
of 11,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,531
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#32
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.