↓ Skip to main content

The Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Dysexecutive Syndrome in Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Dysexecutive Syndrome in Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2012.00159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Ceravolo, Cristina Pagni, Gloria Tognoni, Ubaldo Bonuccelli

Abstract

This mini-review summarizes the evidence of the cognitive and behavioral features of dysexecutive syndrome in Parkinson's disease (PD). Deficits in response inhibition, set-shifting, mental flexibility, and strategy have been frequently described from the earliest stages of PD, although there are inconsistencies in study findings due to the complexity of the executive function (EF) construct and methodological limitations. Behavioral disorders of PD, e.g., apathy, distractibility, perseverative behavior, and impulse-control disorders, may be viewed as the other side of dysexecutive syndrome. Despite the interrelationship between the cognitive and behavioral domains, some reports reveal that the two syndromes may be dissociated, suggesting that both aspects must be clinically assessed. EFs are widely associated with the prefrontal areas, although dysexecutive syndrome may be observed in patients with damage to other brain regions. EFs drive numerous abilities essential to daily life, such as prospective remembering and language comprehension, which may be impaired in PD subjects. Considering the impact of dysexecutive syndrome on independence and quality of life, early detection of executive impairment is crucial in the management of PD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,178,031
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,598
of 11,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,229
of 244,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#83
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.