↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Demographic Features of Vertigo: Findings from the REVERT Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and Demographic Features of Vertigo: Findings from the REVERT Registry
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2013.00048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Agus, Heike Benecke, Cornelia Thum, Michael Strupp

Abstract

Introduction: Despite being a common disease, data on vertigo management in a real-world setting are scarce. Aims: To provide information on the vertigo and its management in a real-world setting. Methods: Data were collected from 4,294 patients with vertigo in 13 countries over 28 months via a multi-national, non-interventional observational study (the so-called REVERT registry). Data included medical history and details of anti-vertigo therapy. "Clinical global impression" (CGI) of severity (CGI-S) was assessed at baseline (V1) and then at 6 months follow-up (V2) along with CGI change (CGI-C). All variables were analyzed descriptively. Results: The majority of patients were female, >40 years of age, and almost half had co-morbid cardio-vascular disease. Diagnoses were split into four categories: 37.2% "other vertigo of peripheral vestibular origin," 26.9% benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), 20.5% "peripheral vestibular vertigo of unknown origin," and 15.4% Ménière's disease (MD). Betahistine was the most commonly prescribed therapy prior to and after enrollment, and was followed by piracetam, ginkgo biloba, and diuretics. MD had the highest proportion of betahistine treated patients. Almost half of patients were "moderately ill" at V1 based on CGI-S. At V2, patient distribution moved toward "less severe illness" (91.0% improved). The greatest improvements were in the more severely ill, and those with BPPV or "other vertigo of peripheral origin." Conclusion: There was a reduction in illness severity over the course of the study, some of which is likely to be due to pharmacological intervention. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,193,180
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,627
of 11,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,747
of 280,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#117
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.