You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuro-Modulating Effects of Honokiol: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2013.00130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Woodbury, Shan Ping Yu, Ling Wei, Paul García |
| Abstract |
Honokiol is a poly-phenolic compound that exerts neuroprotective properties through a variety of mechanisms. It has therapeutic potential in anxiety, pain, cerebrovascular injury, epilepsy, and cognitive disorders including Alzheimer's disease. It has been traditionally used in medical practices throughout much of Southeast Asia, but has now become more widely studied due to its pleiotropic effects. Most current research regarding this compound has focused on its chemotherapeutic properties. However, it has the potential to be an effective neuroprotective agent as well. This review summarizes what is currently known regarding the mechanisms involved in the neuroprotective and anesthetic effects of this compound and identifies potential areas for further research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,444,910
of 24,801,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,409
of 13,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,806
of 291,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#17
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,801,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.