↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral Microbleeds: A Review of Clinical, Genetic, and Neuroimaging Associations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebral Microbleeds: A Review of Clinical, Genetic, and Neuroimaging Associations
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2013.00205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A. Yates, Victor L. Villemagne, Kathryn A. Ellis, Patricia M. Desmond, Colin L. Masters, Christopher C. Rowe

Abstract

Cerebral microbleeds (microbleeds) are small, punctuate hypointense lesions seen in T2* Gradient-Recall Echo (GRE) and Susceptibility-Weighted (SWI) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences, corresponding to areas of hemosiderin breakdown products from prior microscopic hemorrhages. They occur in the setting of impaired small vessel integrity, commonly due to either hypertensive vasculopathy or cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Microbleeds are more prevalent in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia and in those with both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. However they are also found in asymptomatic individuals, with increasing prevalence with age, particularly in carriers of the Apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 allele. Other neuroimaging findings that have been linked with microbleeds include lacunar infarcts and white matter hyperintensities on MRI, and increased cerebral β-amyloid burden using (11)C-PiB Positron Emission Tomography. The presence of microbleeds has been suggested to confer increased risk of incident intracerebral hemorrhage - particularly in the setting of anticoagulation - and of complications of immunotherapy for AD. Prospective data regarding the natural history and sequelae of microbleeds are currently limited, however there is a growing evidence base that will serve to inform clinical decision-making in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 227 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Master 24 10%
Other 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Other 58 25%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 47%
Neuroscience 32 14%
Engineering 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 51 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,772,875
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,294
of 11,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,897
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.