↓ Skip to main content

High-Resolution Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis, Part II – the Total Macular Volume. The First Follow-Up Study over 2 Years

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-Resolution Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis, Part II – the Total Macular Volume. The First Follow-Up Study over 2 Years
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nermin Serbecic, Fahmy Aboul-Enein, Sven C. Beutelspacher, Adnan Khan, Clemens Vass, Wolfgang Kristoferitsch, Andreas Reitner, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth

Abstract

Background: Recent studies investigating the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients have resulted in wide-ranging and often contradictory outcomes. This is mainly due to the complex etiology and heterogeneity of MS, physiological variations in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and/or total macular volume (TMV), and limitations in methodology. It remains to be discovered whether any retinal changes in MS develop continuously or in a stepwise fashion, and whether these changes occur in all or a subset of patients. High-resolution spectral domain-OCT devices (SD-OCT) would be required to detect subtle retinal changes and longitudinal studies would have to be carried out to investigate retinal changes over time. In addition, if the hypothesis is correct, then retinal and global brain tissue changes should be detected in a substantial majority of MS patients and detection should be possible with a high degree of disease activity and/or long disease course. Methodology: In order to address the factors above, 37 MS patients (relapsing-remitting, n = 27; secondary progressive, n = 10) were examined prospectively on two occasions with a median interval of 22.4 ± 0.5 months [range 19-27]. SD-OCT was utilized with the Spectralis 3.5 mm circle scan protocol (with locked reference images and eye-tracking mode). None of the patients had optic neuritis 12 months prior to study entry or during the observation period. Principal Findings: The initial TMV pattern differed between study participants, but remained relatively unchanged over the 2-year observation period despite high disease activity or long disease course. The TMV correlated well with the RNFL. Conclusion: The significance of differences in TMV (and RNFL) between study participants remains unclear. Until these differences have been explored further, OCT data in MS patients should be interpreted with caution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 6%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Neuroscience 4 12%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,171,251
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,019
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,428
of 305,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.