↓ Skip to main content

Hedonic Deficits in Parkinson’s Disease: Is Consummatory Anhedonia Specific?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hedonic Deficits in Parkinson’s Disease: Is Consummatory Anhedonia Specific?
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gwenolé Loas, Cécile Duru, Olivier Godefroy, Pierre Krystkowiak

Abstract

Anhedonia, the lowered ability to experience pleasure, is one of the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is underdiagnosed and consequently undertreated. Few studies have investigated anhedonia in PD by taking into account the influence of socio-demographic variables and versus a control group composed of patients with a pure motor neurologic disease other than PD. The aim of this study was to investigate hedonic deficits in patients with PD compared to a control group of patients with non-Parkinson motor neurologic disease (OND), matched for age, gender, level of education, and inpatient/outpatient status. Distinctions between anticipatory and consummatory anhedonia and between endogenomorphic and non-endogenomorphic depression were taken into account.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 26%
Psychology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,223,099
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,652
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,394
of 220,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.