↓ Skip to main content

Maladaptive Plasticity in Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesias and Tardive Dyskinesias: Old and New Insights on the Effects of Dopamine Receptor Pharmacology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maladaptive Plasticity in Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesias and Tardive Dyskinesias: Old and New Insights on the Effects of Dopamine Receptor Pharmacology
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Cerasa, Alfonso Fasano, Francesca Morgante, Giacomo Koch, Aldo Quattrone

Abstract

Maladaptive plasticity can be defined as behavioral loss or even development of disease symptoms resulting from aberrant plasticity changes in the human brain. Hyperkinetic movement disorders, in the neurological or psychiatric realms, have been associated with maladaptive neural plasticity that can be expressed by functional changes such as an increase in transmitter release, receptor regulation, and synaptic plasticity or anatomical modifications such as axonal regeneration, sprouting, synaptogenesis, and neurogenesis. Recent evidence from human and animal models provided support to the hypothesis that these phenomena likely depend on altered dopamine turnover induced by long-term drug treatment. However, it is still unclear how and where these altered mechanisms of cortical plasticity may be localized. This study provides an up-to-date overview of these issues together with some reflections on future studies in the field, particularly focusing on two specific disorders (levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease patients and tardive dyskinesias in schizophrenic patients) where the modern neuroimaging approaches have recently provided new fundamental insights.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 9 20%
Other 7 16%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#13,501,152
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,160
of 12,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,914
of 229,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#11
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.