↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Body Weight Fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of Body Weight Fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Kistner, Eugénie Lhommée, Paul Krack

Abstract

Typical body weight changes are known to occur in Parkinson's disease (PD). Weight loss has been reported in early stages as well as in advanced disease and malnutrition may worsen the clinical state of the patient. On the other hand, an increasing number of patients show weight gain under dopamine replacement therapy or after surgery. These weight changes are multifactorial and involve changes in energy expenditure, perturbation of homeostatic control, and eating behavior modulated by dopaminergic treatment. Comprehension of the different mechanisms contributing to body weight is a prerequisite for the management of body weight and nutritional state of an individual PD patient. This review summarizes the present knowledge and highlights the necessity of evaluation of body weight and related factors, as eating behavior, energy intake, and expenditure in PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 8 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Neuroscience 23 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,665
of 11,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,276
of 227,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#37
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.