↓ Skip to main content

Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke: Old Wine in a New Bottle

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke: Old Wine in a New Bottle
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Y. Cai, Aakash Bodhit, Roselle Derequito, Saeed Ansari, Fawzi Abukhalil, Spandana Thenkabail, Sarah Ganji, Pradeepan Saravanapavan, Chandana C. Shekar, Sharatchandra Bidari, Michael F. Waters, Vishnumurthy Shushrutha Hedna

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is currently Food and Drug Administration-approved for treatment of both medically refractory partial-onset seizures and severe, recurrent refractory depression, which has failed to respond to medical interventions. Because of its ability to regulate mechanisms well-studied in neuroscience, such as norepinephrine and serotonin release, the vagus nerve may play an important role in regulating cerebral blood flow, edema, inflammation, glutamate excitotoxicity, and neurotrophic processes. There is strong evidence that these same processes are important in stroke pathophysiology. We reviewed the literature for the role of VNS in improving ischemic stroke outcomes by performing a systematic search for publications in Medline (1966-2014) with keywords "VNS AND stroke" in subject headings and key words with no language restrictions. Of the 73 publications retrieved, we identified 7 studies from 3 different research groups that met our final inclusion criteria of research studies addressing the role of VNS in ischemic stroke. Results from these studies suggest that VNS has promising efficacy in reducing stroke volume and attenuating neurological deficits in ischemic stroke models. Given the lack of success in Phase III trials for stroke neuroprotection, it is important to develop new therapies targeting different neuroprotective pathways. Further studies of the possible role of VNS, through normally physiologically active mechanisms, in ischemic stroke therapeutics should be conducted in both animal models and clinical studies. In addition, recent advent of a non-invasive, transcutaneous VNS could provide the potential for easier clinical translation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Unknown 148 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 9 6%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 25%
Neuroscience 27 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Psychology 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,931,581
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,306
of 11,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,076
of 228,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.