↓ Skip to main content

Stem Cell Therapy for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stem Cell Therapy for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel S. Gonzales-Portillo, Stephanny Reyes, Daniela Aguirre, Mibel M. Pabon, Cesar V. Borlongan

Abstract

Treatments for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) have been limited. The aim of this paper is to offer translational research guidance on stem cell therapy for neonatal HIE by examining clinically relevant animal models, practical stem cell sources, safety and efficacy of endpoint assays, as well as a general understanding of modes of action of this cellular therapy. In order to do so, we discuss the clinical manifestations of HIE, highlighting its overlapping pathologies with stroke and providing insights on the potential of cell therapy currently investigated in stroke, for HIE. To this end, we draw guidance from recommendations outlined in stem cell therapeutics as an emerging paradigm for stroke or STEPS, which have been recently modified to Baby STEPS to cater for the "neonatal" symptoms of HIE. These guidelines recognized that neonatal HIE exhibit distinct disease symptoms from adult stroke in need of an innovative translational approach that facilitates the entry of cell therapy in the clinic. Finally, new information about recent clinical trials and insights into combination therapy are provided with the vision that stem cell therapy may benefit from available treatments, such as hypothermia, already being tested in children diagnosed with HIE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 19%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 12%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,895,695
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,998
of 11,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,662
of 231,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#6
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.