You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Behavioral Models of Tinnitus and Hyperacusis in Animals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2014.00179 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah H. Hayes, Kelly E. Radziwon, Daniel J. Stolzberg, Richard J. Salvi |
| Abstract |
The phantom perception of tinnitus and reduced sound-level tolerance associated with hyperacusis have a high comorbidity and can be debilitating conditions for which there are no widely accepted treatments. One factor limiting the development of treatments for tinnitus and hyperacusis is the lack of reliable animal behavioral models of these disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to highlight the current animal models of tinnitus and hyperacusis, and to detail the advantages and disadvantages of each paradigm. To date, this is the first review to include models of both tinnitus and hyperacusis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 27 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,138,089
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,646
of 11,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,656
of 249,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#33
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.