↓ Skip to main content

Central Integration of Canal and Otolith Signals is Abnormal in Vestibular Migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Central Integration of Canal and Otolith Signals is Abnormal in Vestibular Migraine
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2014.00233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan King, Joanne Wang, Adrian J. Priesol, Richard F. Lewis

Abstract

Vestibular migraine (VM), a common cause of vestibular symptoms within the general population, is a disabling and poorly understood form of dizziness. We sought to examine the underlying pathophysiology of VM with three studies, which involved the central synthesis of canal and otolith cues, and present preliminary results from each of these studies: (1) VM patients appear to have reduced motion perception thresholds when canal and otolith signals are modulated in a co-planar manner during roll tilt; (2) percepts of roll tilt appear to develop more slowly in VM patients than in control groups during a centrifugation paradigm that presents conflicting, orthogonal canal and otolith cues; and (3) eye movement responses appear to be different in VM patients when studied with a post-rotational tilt paradigm, which also presents a canal-otolith conflict, as the shift of the eye's rotational axis was larger in VM and the relationship between the axis shift and tilt suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex differed in VM patients relative to control groups. Based on these preliminary perceptual and eye movement results obtained with three different motion paradigms, we present a hypothesis that the integration of canal and otolith signals by the brain is abnormal in VM and that this abnormality could be cerebellar in origin. We provide potential mechanisms that could underlie these observations, and speculate that one of more of these mechanisms contributes to the vestibular symptoms and motion intolerance that are characteristic of the VM syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 40%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#19,333,995
of 24,616,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,846
of 13,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,295
of 265,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#57
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,616,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.